<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/rss/ers.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Electoral Reform Society External News Items</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk</link>
<description>News from the Electoral Reform Society</description>

<item>
<title>ERS response to Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill Committee recommendations</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=167</link>
<description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;&quot;&gt;The Electoral Reform Society has welcomed the recommendation published today from the Joint Committee on the Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;&quot;&gt;The Society&amp;rsquo;s Chief Executive Dr Ken Ritchie said&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;&quot;&gt; &amp;quot;the Committee is clearly of the opinion that the Government has not earned the right to use the grand title of &amp;lsquo;constitutional renewal&amp;rsquo; to describe a modest set of proposals and constitutional corrections.&amp;rdquo; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong style=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=167</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>ELECTORAL REFORM SOCIETY RESPONSE TO VOTES AT 16 AT NPF</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=166</link>
<description>&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;&quot;&gt;The Electoral Reform Society has responded to the decision at Labour&amp;rsquo;s National Policy Forum (NPF) to back the lowering of the voting age to 16&lt;/span&gt;</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=166</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>RESPONSE TO WHITE PAPER ON LORDS REFORM</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=161</link>
<description>The Electoral Reform Society's response to the White Paper on Lords Reform</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=161</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>AV – Progress, but no ‘final destination’</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=162</link>
<description>The Electoral Reform Society has described Peter Hain&amp;rsquo;s call for the abandonment of First-Past-the-Post voting at Westminster as &amp;lsquo;a welcome first step&amp;rsquo;, as the former cabinet minister prepares to make the case for the Alternative Vote (AV).</description>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=162</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>ANOTHER MISSED OPPORTUNITY ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=160</link>
<description>The Electoral Reform Society has responded to today&amp;rsquo;s publication of the Empowerment White Paper by the department for Department for Communities and Local Government. The Society has attacked the DCLG&amp;rsquo;s decision to ignore recommendations from its own Councillors Commission on the piloting of proportional representation for local elections.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 9 Jul 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=160</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Next steps on electoral reform ‘presumed lost’</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=158</link>
<description>Reformers have reacted with consternation to today&amp;rsquo;s publication of the Governance of Britain: One Year On document. The document, which outlines next steps on all areas of the Governance of Britain programme, has pointedly avoided indicating&amp;nbsp; any &amp;ldquo;next steps&amp;rdquo; on electoral reform, whereas trivial matters such as weekend voting and the status of protests outside parliament have all been presented in mind-numbing detail.</description>
<pubDate>Thu, 3 Jul 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=158</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>WOMEN’S BREAKTHROUGH AT NEXT ELECTION ‘IMPOSSIBLE’</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=156</link>
<description>As the country marks eighty years since universal suffrage, analysis of parliamentary candidates has revealed that the parties have not done enough to ensure that an increase in women MPs is even a possibility.</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 2 Jul 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=156</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Electoral Reform Society Response to Scottish Parliament Committee Elections Report</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=151</link>
<description>The Electoral Reform Society has welcomed the Local Government and Communities Scottish Parliamentary committee&amp;rsquo;s report on last year&amp;rsquo;s elections as having a number of sensible recommendations. The Society has not, however, endorsed every conclusion reached by the Local Government and Communities Committee which has published its report on the problems that arose in the 2007 elections.</description>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=151</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Votes at 16: ‘the time is right’</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=149</link>
<description>&amp;nbsp;Today Labour&amp;rsquo;s Julie Morgan will stand shoulder to shoulder with Conservative John Bercow and Liberal Democrat Jo Swinson to make the case for lowering the voting age to sixteen. The cross party group of MPs, together with young people from across Britain, are gathering in Westminster to mark the launch of the Voting Age (Reduction) Bill.&amp;nbsp;</description>
<pubDate>Wed, 4 Jun 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=149</guid>
</item>
<item>
<title>Local Election ‘Freakshow’ rolls on</title>
<link>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=146</link>
<description>While the overall pattern of yesterday&amp;rsquo;s elections was one of Conservative successes and Labour woes, council-by-council results are showing party fortunes depended just as much on the lottery of our voting system as they did on their political support.</description>
<pubDate>Fri, 2 May 2008 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/news.php?ex=0&amp;nid=146</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
