Some helpful advice for completing your Challenge Fund application that can increase your chances of success
Check out your ideas with us before you apply. Before writing a full application it can be extremely useful to discuss your project idea with us to confirm that you meet our criteria. This will ensure that you don't waste your time applying with an idea that we will not be able to fund. You can contact us at email@example.com or on 020 7928 1622
Read the application carefully. Make sure you answer the questions fully and that you have provided all the information required. This will save time during the assessment and will help to avoid disappointment.
Think like a funder. Be clear and concise in everything you write, and avoid jargon or flooding with too much additional information or material that we haven’t asked for. Above all be honest and realistic about what you will be able to acheive.
Keep a copy of your application to refer to. You will be surprised how often you will need to refer to it, both before a decision to approve funding has been made and afterwards, especially when you are completing your evaluation.
Other helpful resources
See our FAQs about the Electoral Reform Society Challenge Fund
Recent weeks have continued to see all sorts of handwringing and dark soothsaying about the state of representative democracy. Untrusted politicians, growing inequality and low election turnouts are just part of this sorry state. So what is to be done? A new report seems to point the way ahead for us here in […]
Did you vote in the European elections earlier this year? Perhaps not – it turns out that the 2014 ballot had the lowest ever turnout of any European election, at less than 43%. Shortly before the elections, we published a report giving 12 practical recommendations on how to improve European democracy for British people. […]
Another 22 peers have been appointed to the House of Lords today. Here are some facts, figures and thoughts about the announcement. The new peers have donated nearly £7m to political parties. The vast majority of the £6,912,841 comes from one donor, Michael Farmer. But another five of the new peers are also party […]