Which Women Win? The 2015 English local elections

Avatar
Author:
Guest Author

Posted on the 8th March 2016

This is a guest post by James Winterbotham, University of Exeter

James Winterbotham is an undergraduate student of social sciences and data analysis at the University of Exeter. As part of a team working with the University’s Q-Step Centre, he has collected and analysed the results of the 2015 local elections.


While the proportion of women in Parliament went up last May (from 22% to 29%), 2015’s English local elections saw relatively low numbers of female representatives elected, new research has shown.

Today we can reveal that just 31% of councillors newly elected in 2015 were women – a slight decrease compared to the 2014 figure of 32%.

In the context of renewed interest in gender equality in politics and increasing efforts by pressure groups such as the Counting Women In Coalition to secure 50/50 gender representation in Parliament – this might strike some as disappointing.

Attitudes toward the urgency of achieving proportional gender representation vary significantly between parties. Likewise, there is no consensus over which methods are acceptable to achieve this. For example, the Labour Party has used all-women shortlists for parliamentary selection contests (see here, p.67). The Conservatives, who also support the idea that women should be better represented in senior positions in society, generally believe that ensuring equality of opportunity for all is fairer than positive discrimination is in favour of women (see here, p.19).

Smaller parties follow a similar cleavage: the Green Party aims to field 50% female candidates at next year’s local and devolved elections, although UKIP argues that policies targeted specifically at women are unnecessary and unfair. Given this variation, it would not be surprising if some parties had considerably higher shares both of female candidates and of female councillors than others. We set out to investigate this.

Is there a difference in the success of female candidates by party? There certainly is. As the bar chart below demonstrates, Labour, the Greens and the Lib Dems have considerably higher percentages of female winners than the Conservatives and UKIP. Labour, for example, has returned councillors who are approximately 37% female, whilst the new Conservative councillors are 29% female; a considerable difference of eight percentage points.

Independents have a lower proportion of female councillors than any of the major parties.   Fewer than two in ten independent councillors elected are female. This may seem surprising; media coverage of independents, although sparse, has tended to give the impression that they are generally ‘different’ to mainstream parties’ councillors and are disillusioned with the current political situation. Nevertheless, although some independent candidates may favour the greater inclusion of women in politics, they are not themselves a shining example of it.

(A quick note on statistics: the I-shaped bars on this chart are Error Bars. As long as the Error Bars of two parties do not overlap, we can be 95% sure that there’s a genuine difference between them that’s not the result of random chance. Otherwise we can’t be certain that a meaningful difference exists)

This finding tells us that the under-representation of women varies between the main political parties and between independents. But it does not tell us why. Further analysis was needed to establish whether this is the result of fewer women than men standing for local elections, fewer women than men being elected, or a combination of the two.

I mentioned earlier that about 31% of councillors elected last year were women. The percentage of women among candidates fielded is very similar, at 32%. In fact, the difference here is so small that we can’t be certain it’s not the result of random chance.

This suggests that, on averagevoters do not disproportionately favour male candidates. The overall disparity between men and women, then, can be traced back to when candidates are selected and fielded, rather than to voters’ choices on Election Day.

The caveat that voters do not disproportionately favour male candidates on average is important, because it would appear that this varies significantly according to the party they voted for. All the major parties fielded candidates that are about 30% female, varying little from the average figure of 32%. Once the councillors were elected, however, significant differences in gender ratios appeared. This means that those who voted for Conservative, UKIP and Independent candidates disproportionately voted for male candidates. However, those who voted for Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party voted disproportionately for female candidates. This existence of these opposing tendencies is what makes the overall effect of voters on gender representation so slight.

Based on these findings, a reasonable conclusion might be that the overall difference between male and female councillors originates in the fielding of candidates, but that variations in this disparity by party originate from the process of voting – i.e. whether parties’ voters are more likely to vote for men than women.

Although interesting, these findings only scratch the surface of the complex and well-documented gender inequality in every level of British politics. More research is needed on the motives and the disincentives of people considering whether to stand for election at the local, national and international levels. In particular, the lack of women among those who stand as independent candidates and are elected as independent councillors is noteworthy and needs explaining.

Once answered, these questions would contribute to a better understanding of female representation in politics – and how to improve it.

Read more posts...