Westminster’s First Past the Post system means we don’t get a parliament that fully represents the voting public.
Millions of people can support one party and get a single MP, while a few hundred thousand people who support a different party can get ten times as many. This means that the issues that are important in Westminster aren’t always the same as the issues the public feel most strongly about.
Parties can win the argument and increase the number of people who vote for them, but lose seats, and vice versa – actually winning more seats when they lose voters.
All this makes it hard for voters to tell politicians what they think – what matters is the seats in the House of Commons, not the voters in the country. Thankfully there are lots of options for upgrading the system to make Westminster more responsive to voters.
What does proportional representation mean?
Proportional representation is not an alternative system to First Past the Post in itself, but the idea that parliament should match the political make-up of the country. If half of the voters are left-wing, half of the MPs will be left-wing. It’s a basic idea, but one that First Past the Post has failed to provide. Around the UK though, we have been using alternative electoral systems for decades that do provide proportional representation.