All votes are equal. But some voters are more equal than others.

Should 10,000 voters be able to decide who runs Britain?

 New analysis of Labour’s target seats for the 2015 General Election have shown just how few people are required to change the Government of this country.

Just 10,000 voters changing their mind next polling day could propel Labour to the largest party. 70,000 would provide a 1 seat majority – 150,000 voters would give Labour a thumping 60 seat majority.

Why should any of this matter?

Our politics remains in thrall to the priorities and interests of a handful of people. These Golden Voters are the ones that count.  Focus Groups will distil their fears, aspirations and desires, which will in turn inform the presentation – and the substance – of policy initiatives and manifestos.

“Will it play well in Thurrock?” will be the conversation now being had at Labour high command, as the party sets about developing policy for the 2015.

It’s Not quite the ‘One Nation‘ of Labour rhetoric, but then our elections militate against equality.

This isn’t a criticism of any one party. They’re all playing the only game in town. Any sensible party strategist, facing limited resources and with an eye on power, will put a relentless focus on the few votes that matter. It’s the inescapable logic of politics under First Past the Post.

The country faces hard choices. It’s a shame the interests of Britain will continue to play second fiddle to the interests of a handful of voters in a handful of marginals.

The Seats that Matter