Electoral reform

The way we elect our MPs is bad for voters, bad for governance and bad for democracy.

Sign our petition for a proportional parliament Sign Now

The way we elect parliament means that it doesn’t represent Britain. Millions of voters can vote for candidates from one party and get a single MP, while a few hundred thousand voters can get ten times as many MPs.

You can see what is wrong by looking at the difference between how we voted, and what we got.

General Elections with Westminster’s voting system

We need reform so that every vote counts and Parliament represents public opinion. The way we elect Westminster’s MPs has a real impact on life in Britain – it’s time we made sure seats matched votes.

Voters ignored

Voters are tired of being told that the party they support ‘can’t win here’. Half the votes cast in 2015 didn’t help elect an MP to Westminster – the highest proportion in a recent election. This made it the most disproportionate in British history, people’s votes simply didn’t translate into seats.

Some 15 million people’s votes had no impact on the result. We saw the same in 2010 when 53% of votes didn’t elect anyone.

Ignoring voters doesn’t solve their problems

Ignoring voters doesn’t solve their problems. But the way we elect MPs to Westminster means that politicians can ignore major issues.

In Westminster, one MP might have twice the support of another – yet they have the same power in parliament. With votes to spare, MPs are under little incentive to make tough decisions.

Voters who picked candidates who didn’t get elected aren’t represented. But votes that stack up with winning candidates don’t make a difference either. Once a candidate has enough votes to win, any extra doesn’t make them win more.

These two groups of voters combined made up three-quarters of voters in 2017. 22 million people voted yet had no influence on the outcome.

This isn’t inevitable. Outside of Westminster, most ways of electing parliaments don’t involve wasting votes so many votes. You can find out about different ways of choosing MPs in our Voting Systems section

MPs – and governments – elected by a minority

Minorities can elect MPs to Parliament even though the vast majority of voters don’t want them. All it took was the support of one-quarter of the voters to elect one MP in 2015. That means someone 75% of the voters didn’t want can speak on their behalf in Parliament – a disaster for democracy.

Governments the majority of voters don’t want

A party can form a government even if the majority of voters don’t want them to. This situation has grown worse as voters have chosen to support a wider range of parties.

Voters can experience huge shifts in policy from one government to the next – on the basis of a handful of in marginal seats changing their mind.

The way we elect MPs makes it harder for parties to collaborate on long-term challenges facing society – and makes for bad government.

Fostering division

Westminster’s voting system artificially divides the country. Across the UK voters supporting every party face large areas with no representation, despite having real support.

Elections become postcode lotteries

When large areas of the country are electoral deserts, parties are left to fight over the handful of hotly fought-over seats – leaving millions of people with almost no contest locally. This turns elections into a postcode lottery. Parties with support from across the country suffer and smaller parties can only win seats by putting all their efforts into one or two areas.

Safe Seats

Because of the way we elect our MPs in some ‘safe seats’ the odds are firmly stacked against any voters looking for change.

Safe seats are the 21st Century’s rotten boroughs. The average constituency last changed hands between parties in the 1960s, with some super safe seats having remained firmly in one-party control since the time of Queen Victoria.

Resources targeted on a small number of marginal seats

The majority of seats can be predicted because of Westminster’s broken First Past the Post electoral system.

As constituencies are small and only elect one MP, rival parties often don’t stand a chance of winning in hundreds of seats across the UK. Even if they have significant support it counts for nothing if they don’t come first. As the loss of safe seats is rare, parties target their resources on a small number of floating voters in marginal seats – meaning they give up on millions of voters across the country.

Safe seats in 2015

Four weeks away from the last election, we predicted the results for over half of the total constituencies. 364 seats were been called based on how ‘safe’ they were in 2010, in line with current national and local opinion polls.

We got just two wrong – that’s how predictable the result is in many parts of the country. It’s no wonder people become disillusioned and switch off.

First Past the Post is the worst possible system for electing our representatives. We want to see a fairer, more proportional voting system that makes seats match votes – and means no one’s voice is ignored.

Highlights from the Westminster Hall Debate on Proportional Representation

It is time to make seats match votes

The last two General Elections showed that our voting system is broken beyond repair. This General Election was no better, with millions of voters ‘holding their nose’ at the ballot box, or left ignored in the hundreds of safe seats across the UK. Sign our petition calling for a fairer, more proportional system to elect MPs.

Sign Now >

More information about Electoral reform

Publications

See all publications

Briefings

See all briefings
Date published
25/10/17
Submission for

Westminster Hall Debate on PR 30th October 2017

Type
Electoral Reform